[x]

deviantART

 
About Me Banned Deviant Antagonist soulsilenceMale/United States Recent Activity Deviant for 5 Years
Needs Premium Membership
Statistics 1 Deviation
479 Comments
2,167 Pageviews
This person has been banned from deviantART permanently.

Comments


Thanks for the :+fav:. :)
pleasure's all mine, great attention to detail.
Mayhew is a cool guy though. I can't say anything bad about him. I like different artists for different reasons. I'll like an artists with one style but not another with a similar style. Sometimes I think you need to see the original pencils to appreciate an artist better. If Kalus Janson butchers it with his heavy-handed inking you might blame the penciller. You know? Sorry Klaus Janson drives me nuts. LOL Yeah the last convention I went to was the locla one but I used to San Diego Con every year and I've been to a few others like Chicago and Orlando. I got some drinking stories in the comic biz. Gah.

Definirtely will let you know if Kirkman rolls in. I'll let you know about the "big" Image thing I'm doing that I'm keeping a secret until after the fact. In case I screw the photos up LOL

--
Finally updated my website!: [link]

The burden and pressure of human consciousness, that ominous and ludicrous luxury. - Vladimir Nabokov
bad art can ruin a perfectly good comic, just look at Gaiman's Sandman, and I'm fully aware that the more old-master style art requires subdued coloring.
I like a ton of old school art styles, (Burne Hogarth, Neil Adams, Frank Frazetta, etc.), but wholly, I like the newer, dynamic stylization more. It just makes for a more interesting read, IMO.

I expect to hear about this big Image thing once its over.
I definitely will let ya know. Frazetta, Adams, Severin, Toth, Starlin, etc. I like most of the old school guys. A lot of the old DC Vertigo books had great writers saddled with pedestrian artists. Kinda sad really.

--
Finally updated my website!: [link]

The burden and pressure of human consciousness, that ominous and ludicrous luxury. - Vladimir Nabokov
*if THEY'RE not going to enforce the rules they laid out*
I think, well, I hope anyway, that the rules are there to keep people from using DA as a place to post stuff without artistic intent. They realize some art will push things to the limit or test boundaries and they are OK with that so long as it isn't harmful or just out and out hardcore. Even though I am against censorship I do believe there are ccertain guidleines that need to be in place to keep DA about art and not have it turn into XPeeps or something. We'll see how things go. People have reported some of the photos and DA is noting hte violations as "Invalid" so I think they realize I'm not trying to peddle smut.

Well not unless I get broke or something LOL

--
Finally updated my website!: [link]

The burden and pressure of human consciousness, that ominous and ludicrous luxury. - Vladimir Nabokov
don't get me wrong, I've spent the past 4 years "crusading" against unartistic policy violations, but unless they're going to enforce everything equally, it defeats the purpose of having a set of rules in the first place.
at that point, it kind of just becomes a "if the admin doesn't like it, it's gone. if the admin DOES like it, it stays" situation, and that's counter-intuitive to having a set of rules in the first place.
I agree. Maybe they shouldn't have rules but guidelines. Well but then it's a case of one person defining another person's art based on taste or preference and that's exactly the situation you just described. I guess it's harder with naked pictures because at some point somebody will even find a simple classic nude to be offensive. My personal policy is just post what I shoot and fave what I like. I ignore the rest. I'm glad I don't have to be whoever it is responding to policy violations though. What a nightmare job! LOL

--
Finally updated my website!: [link]

The burden and pressure of human consciousness, that ominous and ludicrous luxury. - Vladimir Nabokov

Site Map